I actually don’t always play with +70 units. In fact, here’s a playlist of all of the challenges I have done.
This playlist includes challenges such as:
One Lineup Growing Strange No Gacha
One Lineup Stories of Legends No Gacha
No Return Flights 3 Crowns w/ 4 crown restrictions, no gacha, pre powercreep
Primitive Souls No Gacha pre powercreep
Idi No Gacha pre powercreep
Jagando No Gacha pre powercreep
Baron Seal No Gacha
Super Hyppoh No Gacha, no cheese
Floor 50 No Gacha, no cheese
Floor 47 No Gacha
All Advents No Gacha
Unit 13 No Gacha
And more.
I’ve also completed the entire game. Literally every single stage in the game is complete.
No, you can compare units that have different roles. I really hate this statement because it can be quickly discredited by the following statement:
You can compare the roles itself and determine which role is more valuable, based on the context of your methodology.
Here is an example with Divine Kai vs Almighty Zeus, two units with completely different roles. Divine Kai is a melee nuker/ tanker while Zeus is a backliner/ ranged tank.
Under an end game methodology that values uniqueness, you can make the argument that Kai is a much more valuable unit compared to Zeus due to Kai’s functionality/ role/ usage not being covered as much as Zeus, who faces massive competition with many non-uber units such as LKD and both Ururuns along with being overshadowed in the defensive department by Ramen. Kai not only has a more valuable role, but also performs in her function better than how Zeus performs within his function as a backliner or a tank. In the end game department where aspects such as high mobility and burst achieve the best results, Kai comes out on top for her superior role which helps her achieve her goal better than what Zeus can do in his function.
That is simply how you compare units with different roles. Saying a comparison can’t be valid due to differing roles is a weak answer that ignores the bigger picture and dodges critical thinking.